When I heard that Cher and Christina Aguilera were teaming up for a movie musical called Burlesque, I could barely contain my excitement. I assumed– not unreasonably– that the union of these singing divas could only mean one thing: a campy spectacle filled with show-stopping musical sequences. Visions of cat fights, Bob Mackie gowns and over-the-top vocals compelled me to gather a group of friends and head to the Village East Cinema.
The 119 minutes I spent watching Burlesque was arduous; the film was bogged down by a clichéd plot, boring dance routines and bad acting. Burlesque received some favorable press reviews, but is sure to disappoint its main audience: fans of Cher, Christina, and musical theater. (Groups that, I might add, have significant overlap).
The title itself is misleading. New York City burlesque consists of women (and a few men) of all shapes and sizes performing humorous strip teases. In the film, however, burlesque is a cabaret show in which reed-thin dancers perform choreographed moves in lingerie. The dance scenes had the same impact as watching a Pussycat Dolls video.
The principal stars do not share a duet or any dramatic tension. As an aging performer and the owner of a Los Angeles burlesque club, Cher quickly begins to respect and mentor Christina, the Iowa-born ingénue. The main villain, played by perky actress Kristen Bell, is a jealous dancer who tries to sabotage Christina. She’s hardly convincing as a trashy alcoholic, but she doesn’t deserve all of the blame.
The actors must contend with a poorly written script, which includes zingers like, “I don’t want to put any more tequila on your cornflakes!”
The characters are all clichés: Christina is the small-town waitress with Hollywood dreams; Stanley Tucci is the gay best friend and costume designer; Eric Dane is the womanizing mogul. The worst offense is the squandering of Tony Award winner Alan Cumming, who only has a precious few minutes of screen time as the emcee.
Cher does not add any depth to her role. She’s traded her see-through leotards and feather headdresses for a conservative black pantsuit. The actress is a young 64, so it’s a surprise to see performers and cameras darting around her as she stands motionless on stage.
The highlight of Burlesque is up-and-coming actor Cam Gigandet—or rather, his naked body. The Twilight star appears shirtless, then bottomless, in a romantic interlude with Christina. Unfortunately, the rest of the film did not match this level of excitement.
***
Enjoy this post? Follow Downtown Traveler on Twitter and Facebook.
I want to see it now after you post that video haha
No! Stay away– this is definitely a film to save for Netflix. Not worth a $12 movie ticket.
You pay $12 in NYC for a movie ticket? Another reason to love Santa Fe! I don’t know if I would have spent money to see this- but I watched arduous the other night. Got my fill for the next year. I will pass on this. Thanks for the warning!
Yes- $12 is the norm in Manhattan for a movie ticket, and the cost does up to around $17 for 3D movies. That makes me quite selective about what films I see!
Very thorough review. Loved the insight here. OK, I won’t be spending my $ going to the theaters to see this one. Maybe it’ll be in the Netflix queue if I feel up to it.
I’m a huge fan of musical and musical-cinema. Really looking forward to see this.. I don’t think it’s open in Seoul yet. Just seen bilboard. Didn’t know Kristen Bell is in it! I love her 🙂 Love her voice. I remember one awards show.. Emmy or Tony, she perform ‘Fame’ from the musical Fame.
Oohhh Excited! 🙂
and movie is cheaper here. 🙂 If I get discounted ticket, I can see it from 6000 won (around 6 USD).
Juno- save your money! Seriously. This movie was soooo bad. And I’m a fan of Cher and Christina Aguilera!